Omar Alansari-Kreger's blog

Just the other day, a new idea came into mind suggesting that the irreversibility of time and space generates a unique correlation with the structuralized rigor that builds the integral foundations of our societies and civilizations. Based on what we can see with our naked eyes, the progression of time is constant and this applies to the method in which our societies and civilizations exist; they are anything but stationary. This is a clause that directs a considerable level of interest on the role of the individual and how they participate from within their societies.

Those of us who make an effort to get in touch with our intellectual side are in a much better position to appreciate the seriousness of the world around us. This should not immediately imply that the inquisitive party must go out of their way to dwell on all of the miniscule issues that confront the everyday rigor of life, but brings an individual to a point where they can appreciate the reality of the bigger picture.

There is one reoccurring truth which continues to undermine the certainty of what we can comprehensively appreciate at any given period of time. We are concerned about the pursuit of absolute truths when the functionality of the outside world thrives on convoluted manifestations that can take on a wide variety of shapes, forms, and directional qualities. This concerns the distribution of knowledge, truth, and the aspectual qualities of enlightenment.

The fortitude of the human soul presents us with an everyday substance that is often neglected, undermined, and exploited. The individuality of mankind depends on the substance of the human soul which enables the everyday being of an individual. We formulate our worldviews based on those intuitive truths that we know to be true from within our hearts even if we do not have the physical evidence to prove its tangible feasibility to the naked eye.

Those of us who can make an effort to think within the inquisitive human consciousness have already crossed that thin line which leads to greater concessions of enlightenment. The substance of knowledge has the inherent nature to go hand-in-hand with the definitive idea of enlightenment, but both seem to take on an epistemological nature. The attainment of enlightenment leads to a greater level of inquisitiveness and we begin to realize that the rest of the outside world seems to be a lot more complex and convoluted before crossing over that same thin invisible line.

When confronted with the numerous challenges that continue to question the human capability, we need to ask ourselves a simple inquiry: "Are we resilient enough to set aside our differences to work for mutual interest?" Such an inquiry is not only vague, but totally abstract. The mutual best interests of one group may not necessarily reflect that of another. There are many who will argue that any attempt to address such a question on a worldwide scale is an utter waste of time and resources.